Reputable websites

Nurses are bombarded with information and new patient cases that they have not learned about or had experience in dealing with that require further information.  Knowing reputable web sites can speed the information process.  There are common themes among web sites that provide accurate information.  A case study of  Charles encountering a rare condition leads to securing reliable resources as listed.  McGonigle & Mastrian (2015) described the most reliable sources, which contain a meta analysis without any conflicting interests.  Textbooks are valuable if up to date.  For this situation, I would refer to the http:/www.CDC.org.
Some other reliable resources include:

.edu - education sites

.gov - government sites

.org - organization sites

.com - commercial sites

.net - network infrastructures

There are other extensions, such as the abbreviation of a country, ie. .jp for Japan Retrieved from Guidelines for Evaluating Websites. http://mason.gmu.edu/~montecin/webcritique.htm This site provides reputable sources for obtaining reliable information.   https://nccih.nih.gov/sites/nccam.nih.gov/files/styles/original_squ/public/older%20woman%20and%20younger%20woman%20ipad%20ThinkstockPhotos-487910370_square.jpg?itok=y8919RSe This is an example of a .gov site that is considered reliable. Charles should stay updated on reliable sources and research situations where more knowledge is required. References McGonigle, D., & Mastrian, K.  G.  (2015). Nursing informatics and the foundation of knowledge (3rd ed.)  Jones & Bartlett Learning, Burlington, MA http://www.cdc.org

Using Computer Software for Quantitative and Qualitative Research

Using Computer Software for Quantitative and Qualitative Research

Nelson & Staggers (2008) reported on the ANA scope of practice (ANA Publishing 2008), and promotes increasing computer literacy for nurses and recommending specific technology concepts that need to be understood by nursing faculty leading out in the education of nursing students. A research investigator needs to participate in choosing the correct participants, answer the research question and using a software program that will accurately provide statistical results. 

One software that is efficient for qualitative research is Nvivo which was reinfoced by Bergin (2011) who discussed using this software to ensure accurate data analysis is reported on a study. 

For a quantitative study, a statistical databse such as SPSS, which can improve accuracy (Duffy, 2006).   Choose a software that will produce reliable results.

R

https://www.pinterest.com/pin/180636635024546570/

References

American Nurses Association.  Scopeand Standards of Nursing Informatics Practice, Washington, DC:  American Nurses Publishing, 2008.  (Pub no 978INFO).

Bergin, M.  (2011).  NVivo 8 and consistency in data analysis:  reflecting on the use of a qualitative data analysis program, Nurse Researcher, 18(3), 6-12.

Duffy, M.  E.  (2006).  Handling missing data:  A commonly encountered problem in quantitative research.  Clinical Nurse Specialist, 20(6), 273-276.

Nelson, R., & Staggers, N.  (2008).  AAN News & Opinion:  Implications of the american nurses association scope and standards of practice for nursing informatics for nurse educators:  A discussion.  Nursing Outlook, (2008), 93-94

Evidence-Based Practice

Evidence-Based Practice

http://www.journalofnursingregulation.com/cms/attachment/2032848946/2049174172/gr.jpg

The AACN levels of evidence has changed from a numbering system to letters with the highes level being A and contains Meta Analysis versus M which is the lowest and Manufacturer's recommendations only. (Retrieved from http://www.aacn.org/WD/Practice/Docs/Research/01%20-%20AACN%20Evidence%20Levels.pdf) 

   

Implementing Evidence-Based Practice requires recognition of the importance of this practice.  McGonigle & Mastrian (2015) discussed the importance of connecting research with practice while recognizing there are important factors to consider and potential obstacles that might stand in the way. 

Reference

McGonigle, D. & Mastrian, K.  G.  (2015). Nursing informatics and the foundation of knowledge (3rd ed.). Bartlett & Jones Learning. Burlington, MA. 

Survey Results

Survey results of Movenote on Simulation with teaching a new EMR system.

50% responded extremely effective presentation, 50% responded effective presentation.

50 % responded extremely knowledgeable about the subject

50% responded knowledgeable about the subject

100 % responded that the presenter had clarity

100% responded that the presenter was well-organized

50% responded that the information was extremely relevant for use in practice

50 % responded that the information was relevant for use in practice

50% responded that simulation with mannequins was their preferred method of education

50% responded that web based simulation was their preferred method of education

Comments included that the presentation was well done, that hyperlinks in power point were

an addition to the presentation and that this was an informative presentation.

This was a good experience in being evaluated and evaluating classmates.

Credible Medical Websites

Hi everyone,
Most individuals search the web for answers to everyday questions, but especially health questions.  It is important to guide individuals, but especially patients to websites that are credible.  What are some of the important features of credible websites.  When you are providing credible websites for patients, make sure that you have reviewed them before recommending.  Most health organizations associated with a chronic condition, such as the American Heart Association, The National MS Society, etc. have credible, informative websites, but make sure that you are familiar and know where you are referring patients.  You begin with understanding if the author of the web information has some authority in the field they are providing informabion on, has peer reviewed publications, is there evidence of author bias and does the author have clear connections to professional research, sources, etc.?  retrieved from (http://mason.gmu.edu/-montecin/webcritique.htm. 

Reddy (2012) described indicators of reliable quality obtained from websites and how to evaluate data.  There is support in understanding that when peer reviewed authors are presenting information, there has already been a vetting process that should withstand critiquing.  Evaluating references and scrutinizing the authors credibility will help prevent uncredible information from being used.

Abilock (2012) recommends websites for patients that tend to not be invested in a specific drug, but rather ones with scientific research such as the cdc.gov.

In the case study, when I looked up GERD in the listed websites.  Wikipedia was thorough and had references which were credible.  Visual descriptions were accurate and again, references were legitimate.  Web MD did not have references, so this would not be a recommended site.  CDC.Gov is reputable and has reliable information and resources. Typically, .edu, .org, .gov, .health net, are considered reliable, but the author and references have to be evaluated.

Retrieved http://www.credible medical websites.org

References

Abilock, D.  (2012).  True--or Not?.  Educational Leadership, 69(6), 70.

Reddy, S.  (2015).  Help patients find credible information online.  Family Practice Management,
 22(6), 40.

Reliable medical websites. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov.